PTIB, PTIRU, DLI, and IRCC enforced as hard blocks across the platform — with an audit pack you produce in thirty seconds, and the problem admission the system stops before it ever happens.
Eligibility, IELTS bands, DLI, and prerequisite rules are hard blocks at intake — the non-compliant file never enters the institution.
s.56 and s.57 amendments routed, tracked, and filed, with the version history a regulator expects to see.
An audit pack assembled on demand — files, signatures, hours, refunds — evidenced end to end, not reconstructed by hand.
One reporting model means the dashboard, the export, and the regulator submission all show the same numbers.
When an applicant is one IELTS band short, or missing a DLI requirement, the platform blocks the admission at intake — not eighteen months later when it's a finding in your file review. The risk simply never accrues.
See guided admissions →
Every business event is written to a single tamper-evident audit spine — actor, time, and a chain hash computed by the system, not the app — so when PTIRU asks for a sample, the evidence is already there.
"PTIRU asked for a sample of files. We had the pack assembled before the call ended."
Hard blocks, amendments, audit pack, and one reporting model.
Explore compliance →Eligibility and document blocks stop the file at intake.
Explore CRM →Signed contracts and retained forms as audit evidence.
Explore documents →A compliance agent that surfaces gaps before a regulator would.
Meet the agents →Pick your college and a program and see every BC competitor in your market, on one map, with their tuition. Free, straight from the PTIRU registry.
